Close Protection Forum and Surveillance Forum  
Advertise Security Directory Security Shop

Close Protection Bodyguard

Go Back   Close Protection Forum and Surveillance Forum > Close Protection World Area > CCTV Forum

Notices

CCTV Forum Discuss CCTV

Members currently using Flashchat: 1
The most chatters online in one day was 11, 26-03-2008.
lildev666

CCTV Forum Thread, is it against the law to put cctv on the front of your home? in Close Protection World Area; where i live, is one of the main thoroughfares for students to travel to and from accomadation an uni/town, when ...

is it against the law to put cctv on the front of your home?

CCTV Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
d.richie08 is on a distinguished road
Default is it against the law to put cctv on the front of your home?

where i live, is one of the main thoroughfares for students to travel to and from accomadation an uni/town, when the students are here in uni, they have trashed my motorcycle , my works van damaged and doorbells ripped off the front door, my partner has had her car damaged and neighbours too. when we inform the police, their attitude is unless you prove it it students they WONT persue it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:30 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
oh deary me is on a distinguished road
Default

I have got a cctv camera on my house, the neighbours approve.
We were all sick of the thieving little toebags helping themselves to our stuff.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:32 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Pobept K is on a distinguished road
Default

No it is not
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 14-03-2008, 10:06 AM
ACT's Avatar
ACT ACT is offline
Full Registered User
Company: I'm an employee
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manachester
Posts: 44
Thanks: 14
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
ACT is on a distinguished road
Default

Don't quote me on this one, but is it only legal if you're only monitoring your own property? ie not public property. Got me thinking now......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14-03-2008, 10:13 AM
Full Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Walks99 is on a distinguished road
Default

I was under the impression that as long as it doesn't infringe on anyone elses privacy (been able to see through their windows, garden etc...) it is ok for you to put one up.

We had a very similar problem at my old house, the local bobby came round to our local meeting and gave us the do's and don'ts, one of which was, don't go spying!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 14-03-2008, 10:21 AM
ACT's Avatar
ACT ACT is offline
Full Registered User
Company: I'm an employee
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manachester
Posts: 44
Thanks: 14
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
ACT is on a distinguished road
Default

Will have to have a read up on RIPA, sure the answer we're looking for must be in there some place. I'm sure it's a dam good read but for now I'll stick with my Nuts magazine.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-03-2008, 10:57 AM
isstraining's Avatar
Site Sponsor
Company: ISS Training Ltd
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Harrogate
Posts: 82
Thanks: 1
Thanked 50 Times in 24 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
isstraining will become famous soon enough
Default

Guys,

RIPA does not apply to this situation because D.Ritchie08 is not a Public Authority so forget it! However, I would use it as 'best practise'. The DPA does not apply also if the CCTV is covert as a last resort.

If he is to go to the Police with video evidence, he is perfectly able to put a CCTV camera covering the area concerned if he makes these considerations:-

Installing a camera is a last resort - I presume it is

Is it necessary - yes it is

Is it proportionate - yes, so long as he does not have 50 cameras a seismic sensor and a tank to waste them away.

You minimise collateral intrusion - only point the camera at the areas concerned. It may be that you record 'innocent' passers by but you must takes steps to minimise this by tilting the camera or using a narrow angle lens.

Put up a sign stating 'Area covered by CCTV' to act as a deterrent. This may not deter the vandals but you have taken steps to inform them. Under the Data Protection Act this is necessary unless it is covert and as a last resort. SO you don't necessarily have to do this.

Ensure the video has a date / time stamp on it (not absolutely essential but really helps your case)

Use a fresh video tape. If you obtain a recording of vandalism, preserve the integrity of the tape (now evidence). Call the fuzz and Gene Hunt will give them a kicking!

If the culprits were caught and their solicitor decided to contest that the video evidence was obtained unlawfully a judge will be thinking: were your actions fair, unavoidable, a last resort, did you take into account any collateral intrusion....

Cheers

Peter
__________________
ISS Training Ltd
www.intelsecurity.co.uk
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to isstraining For This Useful Post:
Paul999 (24-03-2008), Sunny (25-04-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 24-03-2008, 12:32 PM
Paul999's Avatar
Full Registered User
Company: I'm a employee
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 189
Thanks: 53
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 13
Paul999 is on a distinguished road
Default

Interesting read.
Thanks Peter.

Regards,
Paul.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24-03-2008, 12:45 PM
zatoichi's Avatar
Full Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
zatoichi is on a distinguished road
Default

I would say a covert camera is better but quality images are a problem, its no good having a camera if they know where it is and having one if the images are crap, of no evidential value at all. Some of the council cameras still have problems at night, so unless you are prepared to pay good money or get a security light you may be wasting your time. Have you thought about some type of pyshical barriers or fencing, forget the police they would probally say the images you did get do not show faces etc, i imagine it would be unlikely the offenders would hold up a sign with the names and addresses written on it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 24-03-2008, 02:41 PM
Full Registered User
Company: i own a company
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
nicecna is on a distinguished road
Default

yes it is legal if you are only monitoring your own property, but even than u have to get approval from you neighbours. cuz they can complain saying they are being monitored. so if u explain to ur neighbours and istall cctv, its no probs.

SHAH
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Add to OnlywireSpurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is a good CCTV setup for home use- I want to have my car protected? bukowski CCTV Forum 8 12-07-2008 02:46 PM
Should Director/ Managers of CP companies need to have a front line CP licence? littlewoman Close Protection Forum 7 16-01-2008 11:02 AM
I have installed wireless cctv at home can next door also see what my cam see's if xxxkaibabesxxx CCTV Forum 2 13-10-2007 01:50 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Powered by NuWiki v1.3 RC1 Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC
closeprotectionworld.co.uk