![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||
|
|
||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||||||||
|
|
| Notices |
| Close Protection World Close Protection World Forum area for Introductions, new features and requests. |
Members currently using Flashchat: 2
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 303
Thanks: 180
Thanked 439 Times in 120 Posts
Groaned others: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 25 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Close Protection and Rst pay scales. Formation of a Close Protection Trade Union This industry has collapsed fairly recently, mostly due to lads/girls taking any job at any price. This is affecting the whole Close Protection market and as a result employers are reducing rates at an alarming rate. Pay scales are now almost at the same level as 2000 and destined to decrease to a level below uniformed manned guarding roles by the end of 2009. In fact, some CP/Rst roles actually pay less than manned guarding badge security positions in London. Let me go through the following facts with you and see if we can come up with a solution. Bear with me... In 1999/2000 the STANDARD DAILY RATE: RST - £125 PLUS ACCOMM PROVIDED. CP - £150 PLUS ACCOMM PROVIDED. APPROX 400 CPS IN UK TOTAL In 2008 the STANDARD DAILY RATE: RST - £125/130 NO ACCOMM CP - £150/75 NO ACCOMM APPROX 5000 CPS IN TOTAL What is wrong with this picture and why has it happened? A number of contributing factors have lead to RST and CP wages being on par with London uniformed security guards. (Oh, BTW, they didn't pay for a CP course, just a quick manned guarding badge...think about this for a while...I'll come back to it later) These are some reasons why wages have fallen dramatically:
You approach the end of your course with one of only 3 companies in the UK. Employers come to see the students, selects the students they require, £1000 per student handed over to training company by employer as “finders fee”.Resullt: training company happy, student happy to be working, Client happy with skill set and professionalism of student. Win Win situation for all involved. Oh, BTW, the training was completely on a different level to what is being churned out of some “All classroom/no practical drills” schools (you know who you are.) And now in 2008: You approach the end of your course, you have been promised work,......course finishes.....no work......waiting....waiting.....Ah ha! Job offer....”I've got a position for you, it'll help you get a foot on the ladder...its 12 hours a day at £9 or 10 p/hour, no travel allowance, no food or accommodation, no congestion charge or parking paid for, its in London Belgravia...OK?”, maybe you think to yourself "what a waste of £3000 for a course and 3 weeks of your time for £110/120 per day." Look on Gumtree and everywhere else, you can earn more than that sitting at a security reception somewhere. Think about it. But what do you do? You take it because you think you have no choice...catch 22 experience problem, the employers have you by the short and curlies, and they know it. Trust me on that. Working for free/ less money than everyone else? OK, I've argued this before so I won't cover the same ground twice, but basically this is what is happening to the unwary: From an employers prospective: You work for free, they still invoice the Client £250/300/500 per day, extra easy profit for them, so they think...hmmm, lets get more of these mugs on board. What do you do? Go to a training provider with this proposition: “You persuade your lads/girls to work for me for free for 2 or 3 weeks after they finish their course, we'll give you 50% of what the lad/girl would've earnt” Training provider then tells the students “Right, why not offer your services for free for a limited time so employers can see how good you are? Your time with the company “x” will also give you experience and a chance to network....blah blah blah.” The employer is impressed due to the fact that a certain company has undercut everyone else and is providing labour at an alarmingly cheap rate. Training providers profit increases, Employers costs decrease, operator gets screwed sideways. Is the penny dropping for those of you who have taken this route? I'm sorry if you have been duped, but why should you provide a “professional service” for free? You are upsetting the market extremely quickly.
Close Protection Trade Union. I have looked into this and have come up with an idea. I am not a militant tree hugger by the way, I'm trying to see a way of rescuing our industry and achieving “professional wages for a professional service.” I'm sure many of you agree with me, who wouldn't want a better salary? Now, let me give you a fairly recent scenario. I will use UK offshore commercial divers as an example (bear with me here). They suffered the same fate we are experiencing now. Their wages were dire, but they were putting their lives at risk everyday and of course there were some fatalities. The problem was, they were self employed contractors (such as ourselves), didn't have a voice (such as ourselves), wouldn't stick together and some where quite happy to work for peanuts as “I just want to pay the mortgage and don't want any hassle”. Well, this is what happened. In mid 2000, their average wages were around £165/185 a day. A lad had an idea and approached an umbrella Union, the union worked on their behalf and hey presto, a result! This was the result for ALL N.Sea Commercial diver: Wages increased for commercial N. Sea divers from approx. £165 per day to around £300 minimum. Those with extra hazardous duties (such as saturation divers) wages were increased from £225 to over £600 - £1000 per day. Fact. Also, paid for travelling time, a daily allowance for health, dental AND holiday pay. This has been enforced and a memo is sent to every diving company every year with the minimum pay scales and conditions set in stone. The employers have no choice and cannot offer the lads/girls any less than the union scale and conditions. This was achieved even though the lads were all self employed, worked for numerous different companies and were told “No chance, it can't work” Sound familiar? Well its happened, and it's working well. Working conditions, health and safety and numerous other benefits were achieved in a matter of months and the lads are as happy as pigs in warm brown stuff. If we got together under an existing “umbrella union”, one with tremendous clout, I'm sure we could sort this mess out fairly quickly. If the Umbrella Union is unable to assist, then I will form one and take it from there. I am not going to sit back and watch this collapse happen any longer. It's time we stuck together and were paid fairly for our services. Also, regarding training...this really need to be sorted out. Just because someone can get you to pass the sia exam by teaching the minimum standards means absolutely nothing to many of us. I bow to the providers out there who stick to the old school methods and actually take their students beyond the minimum standards set by the SIA and show them the professional way in which our work should be carried out. This Union could sort out this area too. Wages: These should be intensely negotiated. A standard minimum daily rate of £250/350 for UK work is what I am aiming at, and a minimum Hostile rate of £350/450. Employers may say “we can't afford it” (such as they did to the divers) – but it doesn't matter, the Client will have to pay. If the Client wishes to employ a company to provide him/her with personal protection then that Client should be expected to pay the minimum professional rate. This is totally within our grasp and can be put into motion within weeks. Who would be interested in a Close Protection Trade Union offering a rapid and total revamp of our industry? Let me know what you think. Regards Shakes. Last edited by shakespeare; 18-07-2008 at 12:25 PM. |
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to shakespeare For This Useful Post: | 80085 (24-07-2008), ASE (13-09-2008), Blackstone (18-07-2008), Bootneck (02-09-2008), cedrick (28-07-2008), covert munkey (18-07-2008), DazG (02-09-2008), DC60 (06-08-2008), fagin (21-09-2008), Fingers (01-08-2008), hicstar (22-09-2008), johng990 (25-07-2008), Kelv (18-07-2008), kenpsd (18-07-2008), Knockoutbat (31-07-2008), LeeStevo (01-09-2008), Legioner (20-07-2008), Lietuvis (18-07-2008), MadRussian (19-07-2008), Mrburns (22-09-2008), PabloGonzales (05-10-2008), pepe563 (19-07-2008), Roadhog (20-07-2008), robear012 (22-09-2008), roberto (19-07-2008), ROLEX (12-08-2008), Rosie (18-07-2008), S.Hopkins (19-07-2008), Scab (18-07-2008), scotland01 (01-09-2008), silverback (18-07-2008), tah (26-09-2008), tapmaster (02-09-2008), tazape (18-07-2008), VICTORMACE (19-07-2008), Widowmaker (12-09-2008), yoda (31-07-2008), yorkie030 (08-08-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 63
Thanks: 60
Thanked 139 Times in 32 Posts
Groaned others: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6 ![]() ![]() |
Shakes
Once again a masterpeice, well put ! I for one whole heartedly agree. Thank you for bringing something everybody knows about, but in many cases, don't want to 'rock the boat', to light. |
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Blackstone For This Useful Post: | shakespeare (18-07-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Yorkshire UK, origin Wielkopolska Poland
Posts: 167
Thanks: 77
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
After SIA CP licences [checked today]: Number of security qualifications held 5,914 Valid licences 3,921 Licences revoked 31 Applications refused 77 Since last time I've checked they issued about 150-200 CP licences more [it was 3700 something]
|
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Marian For This Useful Post: | shakespeare (18-07-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 153
Thanks: 16
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Interested, but have serious misgivings. There will always be someone prepared to work for less to get the job; membership of the union cannot be enforced. I foresee a big potential for the union to isolate itself.
|
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scab For This Useful Post: | Carl Dowd (18-07-2008), shakespeare (18-07-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 139
Thanks: 41
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
well,what can i say,thats pity...
if you will form type of union/organization will foreign organizations have an opportunity to assist join? ![]() hope you will succeed. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 139
Thanks: 41
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
If 1 man says no this is wrong,government or lets say sia wont here him.. But imagine 5000people go out and say NO-fix that.. And this way organization can force-out those unwanted underbidding operator's and training providers... Actually about 6months ago ,many organizations HAD to join SIPTU one of the largest trade unions in Ireland, so i think it is possible to enforce membership,also if many organizations as well as individuals will join and stand alongside... it willbe possible to change something... I really hope shake will succeed , and wish all the best... |
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Lietuvis For This Useful Post: | shakespeare (18-07-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 153
Thanks: 16
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
I honestly hope this works too.
Its just that these things have been tried before and fallen flat on there face. Theres always people interesting in doing it and making it work; they just don't put the work in and many lose interest when it comes time to opening the wallet to pay the dues. Its a cracking idea; I think it should be aimed at the wider industry longer term to help draw that out of the gutter and get over crap like minimum wage and £6.25 an hour jobs. |
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scab For This Useful Post: | Carl Dowd (19-07-2008), shakespeare (18-07-2008) |
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Full Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Essex/Saudi
Posts: 52
Thanks: 11
Thanked 108 Times in 23 Posts
Groaned others: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 5 ![]() ![]() |
Shakes
you have my vote. Its about time to stop the operator from being ripped off, maybe providers should stop taking vast amounts of money from students knowing that 50% will never gain work to the market being flooded! Last edited by AndyE; 18-07-2008 at 01:18 PM. |
||
|
|
|
||
| The Following User Says Thank You to AndyE For This Useful Post: | shakespeare (18-07-2008) |